Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 7, 2020
Special Issue – Advanced Joining Processes
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2020002
Published online 31 January 2020
  1. Q.B. Nguyen, M.L.S. Nai, Z. Zhu, C-N. Sun, J. Wei, W. Zhou, Engineering 3 (2017) 695–700 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.H. Tan, W.L.E. Wong, K.W. Dalgarno, Addit. Manuf. 18 (2017) 228–255 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Meier, R. Weissbach, J. Weinberg, W.A. Wall, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 266 (2019) 484–501 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I.E. Anderson, E.M.H. White, R. Dehoff, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 22 (2018) 8–15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Markusson, Materials Engineering, Luea University of Technology, Master Thesis, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  6. Optimizing metal powders for additive manufacturing, Exploring the impact of particle morphology and powder flowability, Malvern Instruments Worldwide, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  7. R.M. German, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 23A (1992) 1455–1465 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Suzuki, Powder technology, fundamentals of particles, powder beds, and particle generation, in H. Masuda, K. Higashitani, H. Yoshida (Eds.) CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007, pp. 293–308 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.B. Spierings, N. Herres, G. Levy, Proc. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., 2010 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Samant, Metal Powder Recycling and Reconditioning in Additive Manufacturing, EWI (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. P.D. Nezhadfar, A. Soltani-Tehrani, A. Sterling, N. Tsolas, N. Shamsaei, Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Jelis, M. Clemente, S. Kerwien, N.M. Ravindra, M.R. Hespos, JOM 67 (2015) 582–589 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Jacob, C. Brown, A. Donmez, S. Watson, J. Slotwinski, Adv. Manuf. Ser. 100 (2017) 6 [Google Scholar]
  14. L.C. Ardila, F. Garciandia, J.B. González-Díaz, P. Álvarez, A. Echeverria, M.M. Petite, R. Deffley, J. Ochoa, Phys. Procedia 56 (2014) 99–107 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. H.P. Tang, M. Qian, N. Liu, X.Z. Zhang, G.Y. Yang, J. Wang, JOM 67 (2015) 555–563 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ISO 3310-1: Test sieves − Technical requirements and testing − Part1: Test sieves of metal wire cloth [Google Scholar]
  17. DIN 66165-1: Particle size analysis − sieving analysis − Part 1: Fundamentals [Google Scholar]
  18. DIN 66165-2: Particle size analysis − sieving analysis − Part 2: Procedure [Google Scholar]
  19. ASTM B214-16: Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Metal Powders [Google Scholar]
  20. ISO/ASTM DIS 52907 Additive manufacturing − Feedstock materials − Methods to characterize metal powders [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Cooke, J. Slotwinski, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. ISO 3923-1: Metallic powders − Determination of apparent density − Part 1: Funnel method [Google Scholar]
  23. ISO 3953: Metallic powders − Determination of tap density [Google Scholar]
  24. ASTM B964: Standard Test Methods for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Carney Funnel [Google Scholar]
  25. Angle of Repose Testing for Metal Powders, LPW Brochure for Angle of Repose Testing [Google Scholar]
  26. P.E. Carrion, A. Soltani-Tehrani, N. Phan, N. Shamsaei, JOM 71 (2019) 963–973 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. H.P. Tang, M. Qian, N. Liu, X.Z. Zhang, G.Y. Yang, J. Wang, JOM 67 (2015) 555–563 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J.A. Slotwinski, E.J. Garboczi, P.E. Stutzman, C.F. Ferraris, S.S. Watson, M.A. Peltz, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119 (2014) 460–493 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Dawes, R. Bowerman, R. Trepleton, Johns. Matthey Technol. Rev. 59 (2015) 243–256 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Pleass, S. Jothi, Addit. Manuf. 24 (2018) 419–431 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.