Open Access
Table 2
Typical benefits of classes of AM methods and various applications with typical resolutions.
AM Method | Classes of materials | Merits | Demerits | Applications | Resolution (μm) |
References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBF (SLM) | Metals | Good mechanical properties Fabrication of complex geometry No need for extra support Highly dense |
Not cost effective Development of residual stresses Product with rough surfaces Tedious and time consuming |
Biomedical Shipbuilding Automotive Aerospace |
80–250 | [81–90] |
PBF (EDM) | Metals | Great mechanical properties Great for complex geometry No additional support needed |
Astronomical in terms of cost Poor surface quality Time consuming process |
Automotive Biomedical Aerospace Marine |
50–100 | [89,92] |
PBF (SLS) | Polymer Metals |
Good mechanical properties Fabrication of complex geometry No additional support needed Great for powder processing |
Energy efficiency is low Astronomical in terms of cost Low density |
Biomedical Marine Automotive Aerospace |
76–100 | [89–91] |
DED | Metals Ceramics Polymers |
Good mechanical properties Fast cooling and solidification Cheap processing route Efficient processing and repair time |
Low resolution Low surface quality of product Not great for complex parts |
Aerospace Biomedical General repairs |
250 | [90] |
ME (FDM) | Polymers | Low cost of fabrication High speed of fabrication Simple to operate |
Poor mechanical properties Limited to polymers |
Biomedical Toys |
50−200 | [71,72] |
Sheet lamination (LOM) | Polymers Ceramics Metals Paper |
Reduce manufacturing and tool time Low cost Variety of materials allowable Good for large structure production |
Poor surface finish Poor dimensional accuracy Limitation for complex and intricate part manufacturing |
Electronics Smart structures Paper fabrication Aerospace |
Driven by laminate thickness | [77,89,90] |
Vat (SL) | Polymers | Fine resolution Excellent quality of finished product |
Applicable to limited materials Slow printing rate Expensive |
Biomedical | 10 | [84] |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.