EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 9 (2022) Manufacturing Rev., 9 (2022) 1 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 9, 2022
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2021032
Published online 11 January 2022
  1. S.N. Economidou, D.A. Lamprou, D. Douroumis, 3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery, Int. J. Pharm. 544 (2018) 415–424 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T.C. Dzogbewu, W.B. du Preez, Additive manufacturing of Ti-based intermetallic alloys: a review and conceptualization of a next-generation machine, Materials 14 (2021) 4317 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T.C. Dzogbewu, Additive manufacturing of TiAl-based alloys, Manuf. Rev. 7 (2020) 35 [Google Scholar]
  4. D.V. Mahindru, Review of rapid prototyping-technology for the future, Global J. Comput. Sci. Technol. Available online: http://computerresearch.org/index.php/computer/article/view/410 (accessed on 2 September 2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. T.C. Dzogbewu, Laser powder bed fusion of Ti15Mo, Results Eng. 7 (2020) 100155 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Dzogbewu, Additive manufacturing of porous Ti-based alloys for biomedical applications − a review, J. New Gener. Sci. 15 (2017) 278–294 [Google Scholar]
  7. T.C. Dzogbewu, Laser powder bed fusion of Ti6Al4V lattice structures and their applications, J. Met. Mater. Miner. 30 (2020) 68–78 [Google Scholar]
  8. T.L. Gerstle, A.M.S. Ibrahim, P.S. Kim, B.T. Lee, S.J. Lin, A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 133 (2014) 446–451 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Wohlers, Wohlers Report 2016. 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry, Wohlers Rep. 2016 (2016) 355 [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Wood, Global metal 3D Printing Market Analysis Report 2021-2028 − Untapped End-Use Industry Verticals and Markets Such as Printed Electronics and 3D-Printing Under Water − ResearchAndMarkets.Com | Business Wire Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210818005298/en/Global-Metal-3D-Printing-Market-Analysis-Report-2021-2028-Untapped-End-use-Industry-Verticals-and-Markets-Such-as-Printed-Electronics-and-3D-Printing-Under-Water-ResearchAndMarkets.com (accessed on 28 October 2021) [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Shahrubudin, T.C. Lee, R. Ramlan, An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications, Proc. Proc. Manufactur. 35 (2019) 1286–1296 [Google Scholar]
  12. ASTM ASTM F2792 − 12a Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, (Withdrawn 2015) Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/F2792.htm (accessed on 2 September 2021) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Bikas, P. Stavropoulos, G. Chryssolouris, Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 831 (2015) 389–405. [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Gibson, D. Rosen, B. Stucker, Directed energy deposition processes, Addit. Manuf. Technol. (2015) 245–268 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Gibson, D. Rosen, B. Stucker, Sheet lamination processes, in Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Springer, New York, 2015), pp. 219–244 [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Singh, A. Gupta, O. Tripathi, S. Srivastava, B. Singh, A. Awasthi, S.K. Rajput, P. Sonia, P. Singhal, K.K. Saxena, Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: an overview, Proc. Mater. Today 26 (2019) 3058–3070 [Google Scholar]
  17. Y.Y.C. Choong, H.W. Tan, D.C. Patel, W.T.N. Choong, C.H. Chen, H.Y. Low, M.J. Tan, C.D. Patel, C.K. Chua, The global rise of 3D printing during the COVID-19 pandemic, Nat. Rev. Mater. 5 (2020) 637–639 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Arora, P.K. Arora, H. Kumar, M. Pant, Additive manufacturing enabled supply chain in combating Covid-19, J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 5 (2020) 495–505 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T.C. Dzogbewu, L. Monaheng, I. Yadroitsava, W.B. Du Preez, I. Yadroitsev, Finite Element Analysis in Design of DMLS Mandible Implants, CRC Press/Balkema, 2017, pp. 155–160 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Choi, H. Cheung, Digital fabrication of multi-material objects for biomedical applications, in Biomedical Engineering, Trends in Materials Science (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. T.G. Spears, S.A. Gold, In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 5 (2016) 16–40 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T.C. Dzogbewu, W.B. du Preez, Additive manufacturing of titanium‐based implants with metal‐based antimicrobial agents, Metals 11 (2021) 1–12 [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Liu, K. Rong, The nature of the co-evolutionary process: complex product development in the mobile computing industry's business ecosystem, Group Organ. Manag. 40 (2015) 809–842 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. E.E. Petersen, R.W. Kidd, J.M. Pearce, Impact of DIY home manufacturing with 3D printing on the toy and game market, Technologies 5 (2017). doi:10.3390/technologies5030045 [Google Scholar]
  25. J. West, G. Kuk, The complementarity of openness: how makerbot leveraged thingiverse in 3D printing, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102 (2016) 169–181 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Pritchard, Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics, J. Doc. 25 (1969) 348–349 [Google Scholar]
  27. D.L. Hoffman, M.B. Holbrook, The intellectual structure of consumer research: a bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research, J. Consum. Res. 19 (1993) 505 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. F.F. Charvet, M.C. Cooper, J.T. Gardner, The intellectual structure of supply chain management: a bibliometric approach, J. Bus. Logist. 29 (2008) 47–73 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Small, Co‐citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 24 (1973) 265–269 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Bartolini, E. Bottani, E.H. Grosse, Green warehousing: systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis, J. Clean. Prod. 226 (2019) 242–258 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Zhang, S. Guo, C. Bai, W. Wang, Study on the impact of haze pollution on resident's green consumption behavior: the case of Shandong province, J. Clean. Prod. 219 (2019) 11–19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Zhu, W. Liu, A tale of two databases: the use of web of science and scopus in academic papers, Scientometrics (2020) 1–15 [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Analytics, Web of Science. Trust Differ. Web Sci. Fact Book Available Online Httpimages Info Sci. Thomsonreuters BizWebThomsonReutersScience 7Bd6b7faae-3cc2-4186-8985-A6ecc8cce1ee 7DCrvWoSUpsellFactbookA4FALRedits Pdf (accessed 10 October 2017) [Google Scholar]
  34. Elsevier About Scopus − Abstract and Citation Database | Elsevier Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus (accessed on 11 October 2021) [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Aveyard, Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care: A Practical Guide (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Aromataris, D. Riitano, Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence, Am. J. Nurs. 114 (2014) 49–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Aria, C. Cuccurullo, Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, J. Informetr. 11 (2017) 959–975 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. E.E. Petersen, R.W. Kidd, J.M. Pearce, Impact of DIY home manufacturing with 3D printing on the toy and game market, Technologies 5 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Vafadar, F. Guzzomi, A. Rassau, K. Hayward, Advances in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Common Processes, Industrial Applications, and Current Challenges; MDPI AG (2021) Vol. 11, pp. 1–33 [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Muñoz-Villamizar, E. Solano, C. Quintero-Araujo, J. Santos, Sustainability and digitalization in supply chains: a bibliometric analysis, Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 7 (2019) 703–712 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Shawahna, Q. Nairat, Research productivity in the field of physical exercise and epilepsy: a bibliometric analysis of the scholarly literature with qualitative synthesis, Epilepsy Behav. 121 (2021) 108058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Smith, Y. Sarabi, What do interlocks do revisited − a bibliometric analysis, Manag. Res. Rev. 44 (2021) 642–659 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. B.A. Niccum, A. Sarker, S.J. Wolf, M.J. Trowbridge, Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis, Med. Educ. Online 22 (2017) 1360722 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Verma; N. Yadav, Past, present, and future of electronic word of mouth (EWOM), J. Interact. Mark. 53 (2021) 111–128 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. H.D. White, B.C. Griffith, Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 32 (1981) 163–171 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. C.H. Hsiao, C. Yang, The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31 (2011) 128–136 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. K.-Y. Tang, C.-C. Tsai, T.-C. Lin, Contemporary intellectual structure of CSCL research (2006-2013): a co-citation network analysis with an education focus, Int. J. Comput. −Support. Collab. Learn. 9 (2014) 335–363 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. N. Hernández-Sellés, P.-C. Muñoz-Carril, M. González-Sanmamed, Computer-supported collaborative learning: an analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools, Comput. Educ. 138 (2019) 1–12 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. B. Berman, 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution, Bus. Horiz. 55 (2012) 155–162 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Kietzmann, L. Pitt, P. Berthon, Disruptions, decisions, and destinations: enter the age of 3-D printing and additive manufacturing, Bus. Horiz. 58 (2015) 209–215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. D.J. Teece, Business models, business strategy and innovation, Long Range Plann. 43 (2010) 172–194 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. M.W. Johnson, C.M. Christensen, H. Kagermann, Reinventing your business model, Harv. Bus. Rev. 86 (2008) 57–68 [Google Scholar]
  53. J.O. Montes, Impacts of 3D printing on the development of new business models, in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit (E-TEMS) (2016) pp. 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  54. T. Rayna, L. Striukova, J. Darlington, Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printing platforms, J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 37 (2015) 90–102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. C. Weller, R. Kleer, F.T. Piller, Economic implications of 3D printing: market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 164 (2015) 43–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.