Open Access
Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 3, 2016
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2016005
Published online 20 June 2016
  1. S. Nakajima, Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Lee, D. Siegel, E.R. Lapira, Development of a predictive and preventive maintenance demonstration system for a semiconductor etching tool, ECS Transactions 52 (2013) 913–927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Barbera, H. Schneider, P. Kelle, A condition based maintenance model with exponential failures and fixed inspection intervals, Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (1996) 1037–1045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Chen, K.S. Trivedi, Closed-form analytical results for condition-based maintenance, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 76 (2002) 43–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Marseguerra, E. Zio, L. Podofillini, Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 77 (2002) 151–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A.K. Jardine, D. Lin, D. Banjevic, A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 20 (2006) 1483–1510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Mann, A. Saxena, G.M. Knapp, Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance? Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 1 (1995) 46–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L.G. Barajas, N. Srinivasa, Real-time diagnostics, prognostics health management for large-scale manufacturing maintenance systems, Proc. ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, Evanston, Illinois, USA, October 2008, pp. 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Cao, L. Niu, Z. He, Method for vibration response simulation and sensor placement optimization of a machine tool spindle system with a bearing defect, Sensors 12 (2012) 8732–8754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Aliustaoglu, H.M. Ertunc, H. Ocak, Tool wear condition monitoring using a sensor fusion model based on fuzzy inference system, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 23 (2009) 539–546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Amer, R. Grosvenor, P. Prickett, Machine tool condition monitoring using sweeping filter techniques, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 221 (2007) 103–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Malekian, S. Park, M.B. Jun, Tool wear monitoring of micro-milling operations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 4903–4914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Liao, R. Pavel, Machine tool feed axis health monitoring using plug-and-prognose technology, Proc. Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology, Dayton, Ohio, April 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Sztendel, C. Pislaru, A.P. Longstaff, S. Fletcher, A. Myers, Five-axis machine tool condition monitoring using dSPACE real-time system, Proc. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 364 (2012) 012091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Zhou, T. Tao, X. Mei, G. Jiang, N. Sun, Feed-axis gearbox condition monitoring using built-in position sensors and EEMD method, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 27 (2011) 785–793. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Demetgul, Fault diagnosis on production systems with support vector machine and decision trees algorithms, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 67 (2013) 2183–2194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. K.M. Muthiah, S.H. Huang, S. Mahadevan, Automating factory performance diagnostics using overall throughput effectiveness (OTE) metric, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 36 (2008) 811–824. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Sohal, J. Olhager, P. O’Neill, D. Prajogo, Implementation of OEE–issues and challenges, Competitive and Sustainable Manufacturing Products and Services (2010) 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Measurement Science Roadmap for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015, http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/upload/Measurement-Science-Roadmapping-Workshop-Final-Report.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.