EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 12 (2025) Manufacturing Rev., 12 (2025) 19 References
Open Access
Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 12, 2025
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2025013
Published online 21 August 2025
  1. C.G. Rodríguez, M.I. Lamas, J.D.D. Rodríguez, C. Caccia, Analysis of the pre-injection configuration in a marine engine through several MCDM techniques, Brodogradnja: Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. Res. Dev. 72 (2021) 1–17 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Mohammadi, J. Rezaei, Ratio product model: A rank‐preserving normalization‐agnostic multi‐criteria decision‐making method, J. Multi‐Crit. Decis. Anal. 30 (2023) 163–172 [Google Scholar]
  3. R.M. Abdulaal, A.A. Makki, I.Y. Al-Filali, A novel hybrid approach for prioritizing investment initiatives to achieve financial sustainability in higher education institutions using MEREC-G and RATMI, Sustainability 15 (2023) 12635 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.R. Krishnan, Past efforts in determining suitable normalization methods for multi-criteria decision-making: A short survey, Front. Big Data 5 (2022) 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Peldschus, Zur Anwendung der theorie der spiele für aufgaben der bautechnologie, Doctoral dissertation, Verlag nicht ermittelbar, 1986 [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Börner, Untersuchungen zur Optimierung nach mehreren Zielen für Aufgaben der Bautechnologie. TH Leipzig, Sektion Technologie der Bauproduktion, Diplomarbeit, 1980 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Zolfani, M. Yazdani, D. Pamucar, P. Zarate, A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization, FACTA universitatis 2020 (2020) 1–16 [Google Scholar]
  8. D.D. Trung, N.X. Truong, D.V. Duc, N.C. Bao, Data normalization in RAWEC method: Limitations and remedies, Yugosl. J. Oper. Res. (2024) 1–17CE1]. https://doi.org/10.2298/YJOR240315020T [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Ersoy, Selecting the best normalization technique for ROV method: Towards a real life application, Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 34 (2021) 592–609 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Vafaei, R.A. Ribeiro, L.M. Camarinha-Matos, Assessing normalization techniques for simple additive weighting method, Proc. Comput. Sci. 199 (2022) 1229–1236 [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Vafaei, R.A. Ribeiro, L.M. Camarinha-Matos, Selecting normalization techniques for the analytical hierarchy process, in doctoral conference on computing, Elect. Ind. Syst. 2020a (2020a) 43–52 [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Vafaei, R.A. Ribeiro, L.M. Camarinha-Matos, Normalization techniques for collaborative networks, Kybernetes 49 (2020b) 1285–1304 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Çelen, Comparative analysis of normalization procedures in TOPSIS method: with an application to Turkish deposit banking market, Informatica 25 (2014) 185–208 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Mathew, S. Sahu, A.K. Upadhyay, Effect of normalization techniques in robot selection using weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud. 4 (2017) 59–63 [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Patel, S. Das, R. Das, Influence of normalization techniques in CMIP model selection using an MCDM method MOORA, In International Conference on Science, Technology and Engineering (pp. 51–59 (2023, February). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4665-5_6 [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Roszkowska, T. Wachowicz, Impact of normalization on entropy-based weights in Hellwig’s method: A case study on evaluating sustainable development in the education area, Entropy 26 (2024) 365 [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Jagtap, P. Karande, Effect of normalization methods on rank performance in single valued m-polar fuzzy ELECTRE-I algorithm, Mater. Today: Proc. 52 (2022) 762–771 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Jagtap, P. Karande, Effect of normalization techniques and criteria weight calculation methodologies on nontraditional machining process rank for m-polar fuzzy set ELECTRE-I algorithm, Cogent Eng. 11 (2024) 2367744 [Google Scholar]
  19. V.N. Thien, H.T. Dung, Overcoming the limitations of the RAPS method by identifying alternative data normalization methods, Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 14 (2024) 15745–15750 [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Urošević, Z. Gligorić, I. Miljanović, Č. Beljić, M. Gligorić, Novel methods in multiple criteria decision-making process (Mcrat and raps)—Application in the mining industry, Mathematics 9 (2021) 1–21 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Chatterjee, S. Chakraborty, 3D printing machine selection using novel integrated MEREC-MCRAT MCDM method, In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2786, No. 1). (AIP Publishing, 2023, June). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145447 [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Ulutaş, A. Topal, D. Karabasevic, F. Balo, Selection of a forklift for a cargo company with fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MCRAT methods, Axioms 12 (2023) 467 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ulutaş, M. Krstić, A. Topal, L. Agnusdei, S. Tadić, P.P. Miglietta, A novel hybrid gray MCDM model for resilient supplier selection problem, Mathematics 12 (2024) 1444 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ž. Stević, N. Ersoy, E.E. Başar, M. Baydaş, Addressing the global logistics performance index rankings with methodological insights and an innovative decision support framework, Appl. Sci. 14 (2024) 10334 [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Sudha, D.F. Edwin, M. Nivetha, Integrated machine learning algorithms and mcdm techniques in optimal ranking of battery electric vehicles, E3S Web Conf. 2023 (2023) 02005 [Google Scholar]
  26. N.H. Son, D.X. Thao, N. Van Thien, Development of alternative data normalization methods for the mcrat method in multi-criteria decision-making, EUREKA: Phys[CE2]. Eng. (2025) [Google Scholar]
  27. Y.M. Wang, Y. Luo, Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making, Math. Comput. Model. 51 (2010) 1–12 [Google Scholar]
  28. E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A new logarithmic normalization method in games theory, Informatica 19 (2008) 303–314 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Jahan, K.L. Edwards, A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design, Mater. Des. 65 (2015) 335–342 [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Weitendorf, Beitrag zur Optimierung der räumlichen Struktur eines Gebäudes, Doctoral dissertation, Verlag nicht ermittelbar, 1976 [Google Scholar]
  31. W.K. Brauers, E.K. Zavadskas, The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control Cybern. 35 (2006) 445–469 [Google Scholar]
  32. Q.L. Zeng, D.D. Li, Y.B. Yang, VIKOR method with enhanced accuracy for multiple criteria decision making in healthcare management, J. Med. Syst. 37 (2013) 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Puška, D. Božanić, Z. Mastilo, D. Pamučar, Extension of MEREC-CRADIS methods with double normalization-case study selection of electric cars, Soft. Comput. 27 (2023) 7097–7113 [Google Scholar]
  34. Z. Gligorić, M. Gligorić, I. Miljanović, S. Lutovac, A. Milutinović, Assessing criteria weights by the symmetry point of criterion (Novel SPC Method)-Application in the efficiency evaluation of the mineral deposit multi-criteria partitioning algorithm, CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 136 (2023) 955–979 [Google Scholar]
  35. T.V. Dua, Optimal selection for machining processes using the PSI-R-PIV method, Appl. Eng. Lett. 9 (2024) 132–145 [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Lata, A.K. Sachdeva, M.K. Paswan, Selection of machine tool by using FUZZY TOPSIS method, AIP Conf. Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053536 [Google Scholar]
  37. K.L Chaitanya, K.O.L.L.A. Srinivas, Sensitive analysis on selection of piston material using MADM techniques, J. Mech. Eng. 69 (2019) 45–56 [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, E.K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, Z. Turskis, Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica 26 (2015) 435–451 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. P. Chatterjee, S. Chakraborty, Investigating the effect of normalization norms in flexible manufacturing sytem selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 7 (2014) 141–150 [Google Scholar]
  40. A. d'Angelo, A. Eskandari, F. Szidarovszky, Social choice procedures in water-resource management, J. Environ. Manag. 52 (1998) 203–210 [Google Scholar]
  41. DT. Do, N.T. Nguyen, Investigation of the appropriate data normalization method for combination with preference selection index method in MCDM, Oper. Res. Eng. Sci.: Theory Appl. 6 (2023) 44–64 [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Baydas, M. Kavacık, Z.Y. Wang, Does the performance of MCDM rankings increase as sensitivity decreases? Graphics card selection and pattern discovery using the PROBID method, J. Intell Manag. Decis. 3 (2024) 91–103 [Google Scholar]
  43. F. Ecer, S.H. Zolfani, Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: case of OPEC countries, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 28 (2022) 1158–1181 [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Saha, A.R. Mishra, P. Rani, I.M. Hezam, F. Cavallaro, A q-rung orthopair fuzzy FUCOM double normalization-based multi-aggregation method for healthcare waste treatment method selection, Sustainability 14 (2022) 4171 [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Ivanović, A. Saha, Ž. Stević, A. Puška, E.K. Zavadskas, Selection of truck mixer concrete pump using novel MEREC DNMARCOS model, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 22 (2022) 173 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.