EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 7 (2020) Manufacturing Rev., 7 (2020) 27 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 7, 2020
Article Number 27
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2020026
Published online 27 August 2020

© S.K. Pattnaik et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2020

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Diamond is the hardest available material till date. It is very much popular due to its mechanical, thermal and chemical properties [1]. Rapid developmental works were carried out in the last three decades in the research area of CVD diamond coating. The low-pressure synthesis of diamond was reported for 1st time in 1961 (Eversole; Union carbide corporation) CVD is one of the important techniques to produce diamond on the substrate. The substrate might be a cutting tool or any commercial or medical application material. There are different CVD techniques like low-pressure CVD (LPCVD); atmospheric pressure CVD (APCVD) and plasma enhanced CVD (PECVD), etc. are there but among all. The LPCVD is very much popular and preferable technique to produce diamond, due to its excellent purity, uniformity and good step coverage [2]. The level of purity is very high in the LPCVD system as enough vacuum is maintained in the curved chamber (which is about 5–10 Torr). So the chance of contamination is minimized. The deposition is with very good in LPCVD with uniform step coverage throughout the substrate. In the case of poor step coverage, there is very less deposition on the side edges of the substrate which is very undesirable, so good step coverage is very much essential for the substrate, having complex geometry [3]. the low-pressure hot filament chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) technique is having various advantages like very simple setup; low cost with less maintenance and highly versatile in nature due to these qualities. It is one of the preferable methods to deposit diamond. This LPHFCVD is simply also called as HFCVD. This HFCVD technique is a simple and cost-effective way to produce the diamond on the non-diamond substrate. Different hydrocarbons were utilized as carbon sources in HFCVD process and some commonly used hydrocarbons are like alkane series- methane, ethane, propane, butane, etc. [4,5].

The diamond tool is in the form of microcrystal and widely used for nonferrous machining process. Tungsten carbide with 6% cobalt (WC-Co) is a suitable substrate material, where cobalt is used as a binding agent. Cobalt provides additional toughness to the tool material [6,7]. It is possible to grow diamond crystal on the non-diamond substrate like silicon wafer or molybdenum which was reported by Matsumoto et al. in 1982 [8].

The cobalt having a major drawback that, due to the presence of cobalt at the surface the diamond converts into graphite during the nucleation stage which is very undesirable. The Co has an adverse effect that at high temperature diamond has a tendency to convert into graphite. It acts as a catalyst for the graphitization of diamond. So it is very necessary to remove Co from the surface of the substrate. Small voids were formed due to the removal of the Co [9,10]. The voids, which formed on the tool surface will be filled with diamond powder during seeding, which will provide a suitable environment for the deposition of the diamond. There are various chemical etching techniques used for removing the Co binder from the substrate surface. Etching with Murakami reagent (K3Fe (CN)6 + KOH+H2O in 1:1:10 volume ratio); etching using acid solution HNO3: H2O at 1:1 ratio is very much popular in recent trends. Multiple chemical etching is also adopted by many researchers by selective acids for better results [11–14].

Nucleation is the initial and most critical stage during the synthesis of diamond. It directly influences the grain size, crystal structure, purity, etc. The carbon atoms can exist at different chemical bonds like, sp1,sp2, sp3 hybridization. But metastable CVD diamond consists of sp3 bonds (sigma bond) and is thermodynamically metastable. Several methods have been developed, that helps to increase nucleation density [15]. The cemented carbide (WC) substrates were chemically etched and then seeded with seeding powders such as diamond, CBN (Cubic Boron Nitride), or a-SiC powders. CBN or a-SiC seeding powders are chosen, because their similar crystal structure with diamond. Other abrasives also can be used for scratching such as silicates, nitrides, borides, aluminum oxides, CBN etc. It is again found that nucleation density decreases with the increase in particle size of the diamond abrasives [16–18]. So the particle size of the abrasives should be optimum and smaller in size are generally preferable. Tiny particles of the diamond are trapped in the void (which occurs due to chemical etching) present at the surface and act as seeds for diamond coating, due to which nucleation density increases to a greater extent. Carbon sources play a significant role in the nucleation and growth of the diamond. Organic carbon sources like acetone, ethanol, methanol-diethyl ether etc. also are capable for deposition of diamond and ten times faster than the hydrocarbons like methane and acetylene. Higher nucleation density is always desirable for a smooth and uniform diamond film [19–21]. Bias Enhanced Nucleation (BEN) is a very simple and preferable technique for nucleate more crystals. Bombardment of electrons on the surface of the substrate takes place only when a moderate positive voltage has supplied to the substrate and a negative voltage provided to the filament through external attachments [22,23]. Uniform and stable plasma discharge carryout when the negative ions attract towards the substrate with increase in bias voltage. So the decomposition of H2 and hydrocarbons on the substrate increase to a great extent. It becomes useful for nucleation of diamond on the non-diamond substrate with the reversed polarity (negative voltage is supplied to the substrate). The bombardment of positive ions occur on the surface of the substrate and good growth of diamond takes place (depth of diamond is about 20 μm/h). It is not only useful for the hardness of the substrate material but also suitable for complex shapes. It is applicable for various substrate materials such as hexagonal GaN, silicon, platinum, Mo and CoN coated stainless steel, polycrystalline Ni, nickel, 3C-SiC, copper, molybdenum. Machining of aluminium with different coated and uncoated tools were reported previously by many researchers. Aluminium is very much preferable as the work material due to its various mechanical properties. So it is very much used in automobile and aerospace industries [24–27]. Dry machining is one of the preferable approaches as it is a very economical and simple one with a comparison to the wet machining/minimum quantity lubrication technique [28]. However, machining aluminium with coated tool, specially diamond coated tool is now in recent trends. Diamond is one of the suitable tool material for machining aluminium due to its extreme hardness and chemically stable properties [29–33].

The natural diamond tool, synthetic single crystal diamond tools are very expensive. So for different industrial applications, they are not affordable. The necessity of diamond coated cutting tool with the same tool geometry is increasing to minimize the cost of the diamond tool [34–36]. The HFCVD coated diamond tool would be a better alternative. It is an easy, simple and cost-effective way to produce diamond on the WC substrate. In this paper, we produced a micro-crystalline diamond on WC cutting tool. We machined rolled aluminum to check the suitability of the coated tool. Two advanced cutting tools uncoated WC and PCD tools are also used for machining to establish a comparison among the cutting tools. The machining was performed at the same cutting condition for better comparision. The comparison between the CVD coated, uncoated and HPHT diamond (PCD) tool were made on the basis of cutting force, surface roughness and tool wear [37,38]. These three particulate cutting tools were chosen for comparison. Based on the results of all the cutting tools at all three aspects (surface finish, cutting force, tool wear) suitable tool was determined [39–41].

2 Experimental setup and procedure

The HFCVD coating unit was used for the deposition of diamond. It consists of a deposition chamber coupled with a rotary vacuum pump to maintain a sufficient vacuum. Besides that, it is having a heating unit, cooling unit, gas supply and control unit which is very well known. The deposition condition is mentioned in Table 1. Cemented Carbide turning tool insert (WC, SPGN type) with 6% Co, K-10 series Sandvik Coromant, Sweden make was utilized as the substrate material. The nose radius of the WC tool and MCD tool are the same 0.8 mm whereas the PCD tool is having a nose radius of 0.4 mm. The initial stage of the experiment starts with the sample preparation. The substrate was cleaned with acetone to remove dust and contamination from the upper surface. All these clearings of samples were carried out in a small (50 ml) borosil beaker in an ultrasonic cleaner (Sonica 2200 MH, Italy, Frequency: 45 kHz). The samples were etched with HCl+HNO3+H2O at (1:1:1) ratio for 15 minutes under ultrasonic cavitation action to remove cobalt present at the surface of the samples shown in Table 2. Due to this pretreatment, the cobalt present at the surface of the substrate was removed, due to which small voids will be produced on the surface of the sample.

After etching, the sample was cleaned with distilled water for 15 min ultrasonically to clean the sample so the chemicals and diluted cobalt would washout from the surface. Then the samples were seeded with 0.50-micron diamond powder (Diamond powder (0.50 μm) 99.9% pure, Sigma Aldrich) ultrasonically for 5 min, so that the tiny diamond particles were seeded inside the voids (which are present in the outer surface). In the seeding process, a moderate amount of diamond powder mixed with isopropanol in a borosil beaker then allowed to seed ultrasonically. There should only minimum amount of the diamond powder should be present at cavity for seeding purpose, the cavity or void should not be fully filled up with diamond powder. So the samples were again ultrasonically cleaned with isopropanol alcohol for 3 min to remove the excess seeding powder. The seeding of diamond powder was carried out ultrasonically with the help of isopropanol to improve the nucleation density to a large extent. At the time of deposition, the chamber pressure was kept at 20 Torr, the temperature of the tungsten filament was kept at 2050 ± 50 °C. This temperature was monitored by a single Ga-As laser (630–670 nm, <5 mW) infrared pyrometer (RAYNGER 3i series) Raytek, USA. The temperature of the substrate was kept 700 ± 20 °C using the substrate heater and the temperature of the substrate heater was monitored using a thermocouple. The substrate surface temperature was measured using a K-type thermocouple, which was located directly underneath and touching the bottom of the substrate during deposition. The flow of the reactant gases H2 and CH4 were maintained at Table 1 and the flow of the gases was controlled by MKS, USA makes Mass Flow Controller (MFC). The deposition time was kept at 8 h.

The PCD tool is manufactured by high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) process and its properties are controlled by cobalt binder. The proper shape is obtained by CNC controlled laser cutting and is induction brazed at the tooltip. The PCD tool shows excellent machining performances due to its complex manufacturing process although it is expensive.

The surface texture of the diamond which was deposited on the surface of the substrate was studied by the SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope SU3500 Hitachi, Japan make). The phase structure of the thin film diamond was analyzed by XRD (X-ray Diffraction, PAN alytical's X'Pert, The Netherland) with glazing angle facility was employed to identify the presence of diamond on the surface of the WC tool insert. The XRD patterns were collected using Cu-kα target, at 0.05 step in 2θ region from 20 to 100°. After diamond coating, the coated tool was compared with the uncoated tool and natural diamond tool (PCD) tool. Rolled aluminum of diameter 200 mm and length 600 mm is taken for machining. Before starting the experiment to minimise the surface irregularities of the work-piece an initial turning take place. The machining of aluminium is perform by using precision Gottwaldov R5 Capstan and turret lathe. In this research work, three different velocities (200, 250, 325 m/min), three feed rates (0.09, 0.12, 0.18 mm/rev.) and one Depth of Cut of 0.2 mm were taken. The cutting conditions were mentioned in Table 3. The tool inserts and tool holder specifications were provided in Table 4.

The 3D-Kistler dynamometer, Switzerland (model 9257B), charge amplifier (model 5070A), data accusation card (model NI-ENET-9163, USA) attached with a labview-2015 software were used for the measurement of static and dynamic cutting forces. The mean surface roughness (Ra), Average peak to valley height (Rz) and maximum roughness (R max) were measured after each operation by using Tylor Hobson, UK (Subtonic 25) talysurf surface roughness tester. All the tests were carried out with keeping cut-off length as 0.8 mm, evaluation length of 4.0 mm and range of 100 μm. The images of the cutting edges and tool wear were taken by using SEM. The images were taken at 20° angles with horozontal plane for isometric view of the cutting edge including rake and flank surface of the tool inserts. The tool wear was analyzed by studying the SEM images. All the results were compared after completion of the experiment.

Table 1

Deposition condition.

Table 2

Chemical pretreatments of WC–Co substrates.

Table 3

Description of cutting condition.

Table 4

Cutting tool materials and tool holder specification.

3 Results and discussion

The cobalt present at the surface was reduced by etching with chemicals, which was shown in Figure 1a. The top surface becomes rough and small voids were observed throughout the surface of the substrate due to the removal of the cobalt from the surface of the substrate. These voids provide space for the nucleation and growth of diamond. The seeding process is carried out by using 0.50 μm size natural diamond powder after pretreatment. The diamond seeding powders are agitated into the voids shown in Figure 1b. The nucleation stage during deposition has shown in Figure 1c after one (1) hour reaction. Now growth of crystal takes place after nucleation.

Uniform micro-crystalline diamond crystals are formed after completion of eight hours reaction on the surface of the cutting tool and shown in Figure 2a. A smooth and uniform diamond crystals are quite essential during the deposition for the cutting tool. The SEM micrographs were taken with 20° angles with hozontal plane to make three dimensional view and shown in Figure 2b. The SEM micrographs were taken at the nose of tool inserts show the rake and flank surfaces of the cutting tool and shown in Figure 2c. A uniform coating was produced with better step coverage. The rake face comes in contact during machining operation with the chip whereas the flank surface comes to contact with the workpiece. So a uniform coating is very much essential at the nose area of cutting tool to avoid tool wear. The hard and low friction coating minimize the wear rate of the cutting tool.

thumbnail Fig. 1

SEM surface morphology of (a) after pretreatment, (b) after seeding and (c) showing the nucleation of grains.
thumbnail Fig. 2

SEM micrographs showing coating at the (a) surface area (b) surface at 20° angles (c) nose of the cutting tool at 20° angle.

3.1 Cutting tool characterization

In the case of HFCVD coated MCD tool insert which is shown in Figure 3 the WC peaks appeared at angle 31.3°, 36.7°, 48.4°, 64.30°, 73.8° with different planes (001), (100), (101), (110) and (111) respectively. The weak (111) and (220) diamond peaks appeared at angle 44.18° and 77.67°. The XRD pattern of PCD tool shows availability of strong (111) and (220) planes at 44.18° and 77.67° diffraction angle. XRD image of WC substrate shows different peaks at their respective diffraction angle. They are (001), (100), (101), (110), (111) planes and observed at diffraction angle of 31.3°, 36.7°, 48.4°, 64.30°, 73.8° respectively.

thumbnail Fig. 3

XRD image of tool inserts.

3.2 Raman spectroscopy analysis of MCD

The Figure 4 shows the carbon phases are not supersaturated at the initial phases which help to the formation of amorphous picks. Graphite picks are the amorphous picks that are hugely present in the diamond seeded coated tool. The diamond peak for diamond seeded coated tool was observed at 1344 cm‑1 wave number with having higher intensity as 2250 a.u.. The strong peak of diamond is due to the presence of microcrystalline diamond crystals.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Raman spectroscopy analysis of MCD insert.

3.3 Cutting force

The measurement of cutting force is very essential during machining. The cutting force directly affects the surface roughness and tool life. The dynamic component of cutting force is taken and shown in Figures 5–13 at different cutting conditions during machining. The sampling rate was taken as 1 k/s. The run-out measured at headstock is 5 μm and on the tailstock side is 10 μm were taken for machining process.

It is clearly shown from Figure 14 that by increasing feed rate during machining, the force value increases. Figure 14a shows at constant velocity (200 m/min) with respect to varying feed rates like 0.09, 0.12, 0.18 mm/rev the force produced was higher in case of WC insert in comparison of MCD and PCD tool. It is clearly observed from Figures 14a–c that the MCD tool give better performance with respect to both WC and PCD tool. The lowest force is achieved in MCD tool insert and highest force is located in WC tool insert. The PCD gives equivalent performance near to MCD tool. The WC tool shows higher force at 250 and 325 m/min in both cases, which are shown in Figure 14b and c. MCD tool shows better performance at low feed rate. This means less force value than that of PCD tool but at higher feed rate (0.18 mm/rev) the MCD insert show higher force value than PCD tool. The results confirm initially at low feed rate due to low friction, minor tool wear has take place. But, at higher feed due to high tool wear, coating thickness decreases.

Figure 15a–c represents the graphs for cutting force at a constant feed rate and varying cutting velocities. It shows that by increasing velocity at constant feed rate the cutting force decreases. The performance of WC tool is poor as compared to the MCD and PCD tools. It is observed that the cutting forces in the case of PCD and MCD tools are lesser than that of WC tool. It is due to the friction in the interface of the tool and work-piece is less in the case of PCD and MCD tools while comparing with WC tool. The thermal conductivity of brazed diamond and CVD coated diamond tool is very high compared to the WC tool. The formation of BUE and chipping in case of diamond tool is negligible compared to the carbide tool. It has been found in Figure 15a that the MCD tool produced minimum cutting force compared to WC and PCD tools. The cutting force produced by the PCD tool is closer to the MCD tool whereas a very high cutting force is obtained for WC tool. In Figure 15b a similar type of condition can be observed. It has been further noticed from Figure 15c that at velocity 325 m/min. and feed 0.18 mm/rev. PCD tool produced very less amount of cutting force.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 6

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 7

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 8

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 9

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 10

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 11

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 12

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 13

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 14

Graph representing the cutting force values at various feed 0.09 mm/rev, 0.12 mm/rev and 0.18 mm/red with constant cutting speed (a) 200 m/min, (b) 250 m/min and (c) 325 m/min respectively.
thumbnail Fig. 15

Graph representing the cutting force values at various speed 200 m/min, 250 m/min and 325 m/min with constant cutting feed (a) 0.09 mm/rev, (b) 0.12 mm/rev and (c) 0.18 mm/rev respectively.

3.4 Surface roughness

Calculation of surface roughness is vital in checking quality of the product in modern machining processes. The surface finish quality was obtained after each turning process. This is another primary aspect of the final product. The surface finish depends on various cutting parameters, tool material and also in work-piece material. The cost of the final product also depends on the level of surface finish. Three readings were taken for each experiment to avoid measurement errors along an axis parallel to the axis of the work-piece. The roughness values were measured at three different locations on the work-piece. The average value of the three measurements were considered. Ra at constant speed (200 m/min) and various feed rates (0.09, 0.12, 0.18 mm/rev. respectively) were shown in Figure 16a–c. The PCD tool produced better surface at low feed rate (0.09 mm/min) which was expected. The Ra also increased with increase in feed rate thus increase in surface roughness. The WC cutting tool produced an average surface finish. The MCD tool produced low surface finish among all cutting tools. This is because after etching, the nose of the cutting tool became rough (due to the removal of Co) and after coating the diamond grains were projected outward, which can be seen from Figure 2b. So the MCD tool produced low surface finish compared to WC and PCD tools. The surface roughness was minimum in case of WC cutting tool at low feed rate (0.09 mm/rev.) but at higher feed rates it produced average surface finish similar to the other cutting tools shown in Figure 17a–c. But still, the WC tool produced better surface finish at medium speed (250 m/min.). It has been found from MCD and PCD tools, that both of them have produced an almost similar surface finish shown in Figure 18a–c. However, at higher feed rate (0.18 mm/rev.), the MCD tool shows better surface finish compared to the PCD tool. The uncoated WC tool produced better surface finish at higher speed (325 m/min.) and low feed (0.09 mm/rev.). But surprisingly at medium (0.12 mm/rev) and high (0.18 mm/rev) feed rate, the MCD tool produced comparatively better surface finish among all. The PCD tool produced almost an average surface finish.

thumbnail Fig. 16

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 200 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev; constant depth of cut 0.02 mm.
thumbnail Fig. 17

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 250 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev.
thumbnail Fig. 18

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 325 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev.

3.5 Tool wear analysis

The study of tool wear in case of machining is vital to know the tool life of the tool. Tool wear occurs at the nose radius, rake face, flank face as well as on trailing clearance face. There are various types of wear mechanism occurs during machining process. This wear pattern provides lots of information about the effectiveness of the machining operation. The tool wear is directly proportional to the tool life. Tool life is also affected by factors like cutting forces, surface roughness, chip control, accuracy and precision as well as the economy of the machining operation. The wear mainly occurs due to the adhesion and diffusion of Al on tool surfaces. Cutting tools generally fail by quick dulling, mechanical breakage and gradual wear at the chip-tool and work-tool interfaces. The first two methods of premature failure could be almost eliminated by the development of tool materials, selection of tool geometry, cutting parameters and cutting environments. However, the tool failure which is inevitable cannot be prevented but it can be delayed only. The basic mechanisms of tool wear are flank, crater and abrasive wear.

The tool wear study was performed after completion of machining processes. Each tool was used in machining for 270 s. It can be observed from Figure 19a that, in the case of MCD small amount of sliding lines have been formed over the rake surface and some amount of upper layer of the tool face is being removed. The tool nose or tip has negligible chamfering due to small nose wear. The Figure 19b shows SEM image depicting the rake faces of PCD tool. In case of PCD tool a small amount of tooltips got damaged and no sliding lines are visible on the rake face. There is no sticking of any extra material over rake and flank face. A large number of sliding lines have been formed over the rake surface and the upper layer of the tool face was removed in WC insert. The measure chamfering of tooltip was located in Figure 19c. It was a clear evidence of sticking of some extra material on the flank face. But the presence of aluminum is slightly high compared to MCD insert. This is caused due to formation of built-up edge (BUE).

It was clear evidence of sticking of some extra material on the flank face but the amount of extra material was very small compared to WC insert. Thus, MCD insert gets less wear than WC but higher than PCD tool.

thumbnail Fig. 19

SEM images of tool wear.

3.6 Chip underface

Aluminum and its alloys are industrially known as ductile material which provides continuous chips. During machining, continuous chip provides more friction between tool rake face and chip which may affect the tool and chip underface. The chemical reaction between the tool rake and chip increases due to friction which hinders smooth flow of chips. This causes formation of micro cracks in chip underface. It can be observed from Figure 20 that the continuous feed and sliding marks are shown in case of the MCD tool. In the case of PCD tool, smooth regular feed marks at regular interval are shown with no appearance of cracks or micro voids. This tends to no adhesion of aluminum during machining. The WC tool contains non-uniform sliding marks and more number of micro cracks. The white spots located in the underface due to adhesion of aluminum during machining.

thumbnail Fig. 20

SEM images of chip underface after machining.

4 Conclusion

In this paper, MCD film was deposited on WC cutting tool inserts for turning aluminium. Two other cutting tools (WC, PCD) were also used for the same to compare and to find out the suitability of the coated tools.

  • Specifically, it was found that the WC and PCD produced better surface finish compared to the MCD tool. However at high speed and low feed rate (finishing operation), it showed promising results.

  • Regarding force measurement, a minimum cutting force was produced while machining with the MCD cutting tool which is an indication of providing maximum tool life.

  • The analysis of tool wear (by the study of SEM images) represents that, the wear occurred on the PCD tool was less compared to MCD and WC tools. Nevertheless, the performance of the MCD tool is quite impressive, because negligible wear occurred after machining.

  • In chip underface study, it was observed that less destruction produced with the PCD tool. So it indicates that less tool wear was formed in PCD tool. In this study also a promising result was observed with using MCD tool in machining.

After a complete analysis of the results, we may conclude that PCD is a better cutting tool for machining of aluminum. But when we consider overall performance with cost-effectiveness, the MCD found as the best cutting tool among all. So MCD may be recommended for the machining of aluminum and its alloys for industrial applications.

In terms of future work, this study can be extended by using a different coated tool to establish better comparison. Further investigations can be carried out by adopting different coating techniques.

Acknowledgments

This experimental work is carried out by the support of Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR-2013), New Delhi, India (CSIR-22(0628)/13/EMR-II). The authors would like to acknowledge all the laboratory staff of Mechanical Engineering Department, VSSUT, Burla for their kind support.

References

  1. R.K. Ghadai, K. Kalita, S.C. Mondal, B.P. Swain, PECVD process parameter optimization: towards increased hardness of diamond-like carbon, Thin Films. Mater. Manuf. Process. 33 (2018) 1905–1913 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Wang, C. Wang, F. Sun, C. Ding, Simulation and experimental researches on HFCVD diamond film growth on small inner-hole surface of wire-drawing die with no filament through the hole, Surf. Coatings Technol. 339 (2018) 1–13 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Paprocki, A. Dittmar-Wituski, M. Trzciński, M. Szybowicz, K. Fabisiak, A. Dychalska, The comparative studies of HF CVD diamond films by Raman and XPS spectroscopies, Opt. Mater. (Amst). 95 (2019) 109251 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Aydin, Prediction of cutting speed interval of diamond-coated tools with residual stress, Mater. Manuf. Process. 32 (2027) 145–150 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R.K. Ghadai, K. Kalita, S.C. Mondal, B.P. Swain, Genetically optimized diamond-like carbon thin film coatings, Mater. Manuf. Process. 34 (2019) 1476–1487 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Chen, D. Xiang, H. Feng, B. Wu, X. Niu, Fabrication and performance of boron doped textured diamond coated tool, Surf. Eng. (2019) 1–8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Y.K. Lim, E.S. Lee, C.H. Lee, D.S. Lim, Fabrication of hollow boron-doped diamond nanostructure via electrochemical corrosion of a tungsten oxide template, Nanotechnology 29 (2018) 325602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Matsumoto, Y. Sato, M. Kamo, N. Setaka, Vapor, deposition of diamond particles from methane, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21 (1982) 183–185 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Abdel-Hafiez, D. Kumar, R. Thiyagarajan, Q. Zhang, R.T. Howie, K. Sethupathi, O. Volkova, A. Vasiliev, W. Yang, H.K. Mao, High-pressure behavior of superconducting boron-doped diamond, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 1–7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W.L. Shi, X.T. Wei, W. Zhang, Z.G. Wang, C.H. Dong, S. Li, Developments and applications of diamond-like carbon, Appl. Mech. Mater. 864 (2017) 14–24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S.K. Sarangi, A. Chattopadhyay, A.K. Chattopadhyay, Effect of pretreatment methods and chamber pressure on morphology, quality and adhesion of HFCVD diamond coating on cemented carbide inserts, Appl. Surface Sci. 254 (2008) 3721–3733 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Q. Wei, Z.M. Yu, M.N.R. Ashfold, J. Ye, L. Ma, Applied surface science synthesis of micro- or nano-crystalline diamond films on WC-Co substrates with various pretreatments by hot filament chemical vapor deposition, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256 (2010) 4357–4364 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M.S. Raghuveer, S.N. Yoganand, K. Jagannadham, R.L. Lemaster, J. Bailey, Improved CVD diamond coatings on WC-Co tool substrates, Wear 253 (2002) 1194–1206 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Amaral, D.J. Silva, A.J.S. Fernandes, F.M. Costa, F.J. Oliveira, R.F. Silva, Surface activation pre-treatments for NCD films grown by HFCVD, Vaccum 83 (2009) 1228–1232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Zhang, F. Qin, W. Qian, L. Zhang, F. Sun, Characterisation of microcrystalline diamonds deposited by HFCVD. Int. J. Abras. Technol. 8 (2018) 292–309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Dejun, Z. Wen, Z. Ling, Friction-wear behaviors of chemical vapor deposited diamond films at high temperatures, J. Superhard Mater. 41 (2019) 98–105 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Zhang, M. Shen, Z. He, The unusual tribological behavior of diamond-like carbon films under high vacuum, Surf. Interface Anal. (2020) 1–9 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Viswanathan, L. Mohan, P. Bera, S. Shanthiswaroop, M. Muniprakash, H.C. Barshilia, C. Anandan, Corrosion and wear resistance properties of multilayered diamond-like carbon nanocomposite coating, Surf. Interface Anal. 50 (2018) 265–276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Sabzi, S.H. Mousavi Anijdan, M. Asadian, The effect of substrate temperature on microstructural evolution and hardenability of tungsten carbide coating in hot filament chemical vapor deposition, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 15 (2018) 1350–1357 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. V.M. Kvasnytsya, I.V. Kvasnytsia, A. Zheldak, Cyclic twins of CVD diamond crystals, J. Superhard Mater. 41 (2019) 369–376 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Zhang, F. Qin, L. Zhang, L. Gao, F. Sun, HFCVD synthesis of boron-doped microcrystalline diamonds, J. Superhard Mater. 41 (2019) 143–148 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Mukherjee, R. Polini, V. Valentini, S.Z. Rotter, J.C. Mendes, HFCVD nanostructured diamond films deposited by a combination of seeding suspensions and novel nucleation process, Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng. 11 (2017) 225–240 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S.H. Din, M.A. Shah, N.A. Sheikh, Tribological performance of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V via CVD-diamond coatings, J. Superhard Mater. 40 (2018) 26–39 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Xu, K. Chen, S. Wang, S. Chen, X. Chen, Influence of pretreatment on diamond-coated tool nucleation and machining performance, Surf. Rev. Lett. 24 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. A.N. Jones, W. Ahmed, C.A. Rego, H. Taylor, B.D. Beake, M.J. Jackson, Investigation of the tribological properties of diamond films, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 16 (2007) 131–134 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Panda, S.R. Das, D. Dhupal, Machinability investigation and sustainability assessment in FDHT with coated ceramic tool, Steel Compos. Struct. 34 (2020) 681–698 [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Panda, S.R. Das, D. Dhupal, Machinability investigation of HSLA steel in hard turning with coated ceramic tool: assessment, modeling, optimization and economic aspects, J. Adv. Manufactur. Syst. 18 (2019) 625–655 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. U.C. Okonkwo, I.P. Okokpujie, J.E. Sinebe, C.A.K. Ezugwu, Comparative analysis of aluminium surface roughness in end-milling under dry and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) conditions, Manufactur. Rev. 2 (2015) 30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Das, N. Tirkey, S.K. Patel, S.R. Das, B.B. Biswal, A comparison of machinability in hard turning of EN-24 alloy steel under mist cooled and dry cutting environments with a coated cermet tool, J. Fail. Anal. Prevent. 19 (2019) 115–130 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Das, S.K. Patel, B.B. Biswal, S.R. Das, Machinability investigation and cost estimation during finish dry hard turning of AISI 4340 steel with untreated and cryo treated cermet inserts, J. Superhard Mater. 41 (2019) 247–264 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Singh, Novel techniques for selective diamond growth on various substrates, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 3 (1994) 78–85 [Google Scholar]
  32. M.J. Jackson, A.N. Jones, W. Ahmed, Experimental and gas phase modeling of nanocrystalline diamond films grown on titanium alloys for biomedical applications, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 14 (2005) 565–568 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Sein, W. Ahmed, C. Rego, M. Jackson, R. Polini, Comparative investigation of smooth polycrystalline diamond films on dental burs by chemical vapor dep.osition, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 15 (2006) 195–200 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Ahmed, A. Siddique, J. Anderson, C. Engdahl, M. Holtz, E. Piner, Selective area deposition of hot filament CVD diamond on 100 Mm MOCVD grown AlGaN/GaN wafers, Cryst. Growth Des. 19 (2019) 672–677 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A.F. Sartori, S. Orlando, A. Bellucci, D.M. Trucchi, S. Abrahami, T. Boehme, T. Hantschel, W. Vandervorst, J.G. Buijnsters, Laser-induced periodic surface structures (LIPSS) on heavily boron-doped diamond for electrode applications, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 43236–43251 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. A.P. Bolshakov, V.G. Ralchenko, V.Y. Yurov, G. Shu, E.V. Bushuev, A.A. Khomich, E.E. Ashkinazi, D.N. Sovyk, I.A. Antonova, S.S. Savin, Enhanced deposition rate of polycrystalline CVD diamond at high microwave power densities, Diam. Relat. Mater. 97 (2019) 107466 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Kurniawan, T.J. Ko, A study of surface texturing using piezoelectric tool holder actuator on conventional CNC turning, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manufactur. 14 (2013) 199–206 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Q. Wu, D.P. Li, Analysis and X-ray measurements of cutting residual stresses in 7075 aluminum alloy in high speed machining, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manufactur. 15 (2014) 1499–1506 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. N.V. Novikov, Superhard materials in mechanical engineering, Powder Metal. Metal Ceram. 32 (1993) 386–389 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Panda, S.R. Das, D. Dhupal, Machinability investigation of HSLA steel in hard turning with coated ceramic tool: assessment, modeling, optimization and economic aspects, J. Adv. Manufactur. Syst. 18 (2019) 625–655 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Anand, A.K. Behera, S.R. Das, An overview on economic machining of hardened steels by hard turning and its process variables, Manufactur. Rev. 6 (2019) 4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Sisira Kanta Pattnaik, Minaketan Behera, Sachidananda Padhi, Pusparaj Dash, Saroj Kumar Sarangi, Study of cutting force and tool wear during turning of aluminium with WC, PCD and HFCVD coated MCD tools, Manufacturing Rev. 7, 27 (2020)

All Tables

Table 1

Deposition condition.

In the text
Table 2

Chemical pretreatments of WC–Co substrates.

In the text
Table 3

Description of cutting condition.

In the text
Table 4

Cutting tool materials and tool holder specification.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

SEM surface morphology of (a) after pretreatment, (b) after seeding and (c) showing the nucleation of grains.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

SEM micrographs showing coating at the (a) surface area (b) surface at 20° angles (c) nose of the cutting tool at 20° angle.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

XRD image of tool inserts.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Raman spectroscopy analysis of MCD insert.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 200 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 250 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.09 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.12 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 13

Dynamic component of cutting force vs. time graph at v = 325 m/min, f = 0.18 mm/rev, d = 0.2 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 14

Graph representing the cutting force values at various feed 0.09 mm/rev, 0.12 mm/rev and 0.18 mm/red with constant cutting speed (a) 200 m/min, (b) 250 m/min and (c) 325 m/min respectively.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 15

Graph representing the cutting force values at various speed 200 m/min, 250 m/min and 325 m/min with constant cutting feed (a) 0.09 mm/rev, (b) 0.12 mm/rev and (c) 0.18 mm/rev respectively.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 16

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 200 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev; constant depth of cut 0.02 mm.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 17

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 250 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 18

Graph representing the roughness values (Ra, Rz, R max) for different tools at constant velocity of 325 m/min and varying feed, (a) Feed = 0.09 mm/rev, (b) Feed = 0.12 mm/rev and (c) Feed = 0.18 mm/rev.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 19

SEM images of tool wear.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 20

SEM images of chip underface after machining.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.