Open Access
Review
Issue
Manufacturing Rev.
Volume 1, 2014
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2014006
Published online 05 August 2014
  1. W. Roberts, The metallurgical Society of AIME 56 (1982) 109. [Google Scholar]
  2. B.Y. Xu et al., Int. J. Mech. Sci. 48 (2006) 190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Chen et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 5073. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T.M. Pollock et al., J. Propuls. Power 22 (2006) 361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C.M. Sellars, Mater. Sci. Technol. 6 (1990) 1072. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.J. McQueen, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387–389 (2004) 203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C.M. Sellars et al., Metal Sci. 13 (1979) 187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V.V. Kutumbarao et al., Bull. Mater. Sci. 19 (1996) 677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H.J. McQueen et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 53 (1995) 293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Yada et al., JSTP 27 (1986) 33. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Kopp et al., Advanced Technology of Plasticity 24–28 (1987) 1229. [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Laasraoui et al., Metall. Trans. A 22 (1991) 151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Nanba et al., ISIJ Int. 32 (1992) 377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.D. Hodgson et al., ISIJ Int. 32 (1992) 1329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S.-I. Kim et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 311 (2001) 108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S.-I. Kim et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355 (2003) 384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Serajzadeh et al., Mech. Res. Commun. 30 (2003) 87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Liu et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 529 (2011) 300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Dehghan-Manshadia et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 485 (2008) 664. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Y.-S. Jang et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 101 (2000) 85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Bontcheva et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 28 (2003) 563. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N.K. Park et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 111 (2001) 98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Y.-S. Na et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 141 (2003) 337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. H.S. Jeong et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 162–163 (2005) 504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. F.S. Du et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 187–188 (2007) 591. [Google Scholar]
  26. D.-J. Cha et al., Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12 (2011) 331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. A.M. Elwazri et al., ISIJ Int. 44 (2004) 162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A.M. Elwazri et al., ISIJ Int. 44 (2004) 744. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Dehghan-Manshadi et al., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39 (2008) 1359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Dehghan-Manshadi et al., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39 (2008) 1371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Y.C. Lin et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 501 (2009) 229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Y.C. Lin et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009) 2477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Y.C. Lin et al., J. Mater. Sci. 44 (2009) 835. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Chen et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 540 (2012) 46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. F. Chen et al., J. Mater. Eng. Perform. (2014), DOI: 10.1007/s11665-014-1083-8. [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Wang, PhD thesis, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Liu, PhD thesis, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  38. X.S. Li, PhD thesis, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  39. D.J. Naylor, Mater. Sci. Forum 284–286 (1998) 83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Wang et al., Acta Metall. Sin. 19 (2006) 279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Liu et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 529 (2011) 300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. J. Liu et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009) 5871. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. E.P. Busso et al., Int. J. Plast. 14 (1998) 319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. F. Roters et al., Acta Mater. 48 (2000) 4181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Lin et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 143–144 (2003) 281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Y. Estrin, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 463 (2007) 171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. D.R. Steinmetz et al., Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Q.L. Jin, J. Plastic Eng. 1 (1994) 3. [Google Scholar]
  49. B.Y. Xu et al., Int. J. Mech. Sci. 48 (2006) 190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. J. Qu et al., Acta Mech. Sin. 20 (2004) 499. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. J. Qu et al., Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 1267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Z.C. Sun et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 3464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. X.G. Fan et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 5368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. X.G. Fan et al., Int. J. Plast. 27 (2011) 1833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. F. Roters et al., Acta Mater. 58 (2010) 1152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. J.P. Ponthot et al., Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2006) 5472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. A. Andrade-Campos et al., Int. J. Plast. 23 (2007) 1349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. J. Qu et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 197 (2008) 212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. K. Spranghers et al., Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 (2014) 210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. D. Raabe et al., Continuum scale simulation of engineering materials, Wiley, Weinheim, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. K.G.F. Janssens et al., Computational materials engineering – an introduction to microstructure evolution, Academic Press, Elsevier, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  62. N.M. Xiao et al., Sci. China Tech. Sci. 55 (2012) 341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. D. Raabe, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 32 (2002) 53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. D. Raabe et al., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 8 (2000) 445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. D. Raabe et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 34 (2005) 299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. X.Y. Song et al., Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 5541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. D. Raabe et al., Philos. Mag. 79 (1999) 2339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Y. Liu et al., Scripta Mater. 34 (1996) 1679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. P.A. Beck et al., J. Appl. Phys. 21150 (1950). [Google Scholar]
  70. P.A. Beck et al., Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. K.G.F. Janssens, Math. Comput. Simulat. 80 (2010) 1361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. B.-N. Kim et al., Mater. Trans. JIM 44 (2003) 2239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. J. Geiger et al., Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. S. Raghavan et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 445–446 (2007) 203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. S. Raghavan et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 46 (2009) 92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Y.Z. He et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 429 (2006) 236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. F. Chen et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 5539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. C. Wu et al., Chin. Sci. Bull. 57 (2012) 1473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  79. H. Yang et al., Science China 54 (2011) 2107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. H. Mecking et al., Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 1865. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  81. Y. Estrin et al., Acta Metall. 32 (1984) 57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  82. R. Ding et al., Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 3163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  83. V. Marx et al., Acta Mater. 47 (1999) 1219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  84. G. Kugler et al., Acta Mater. 52 (2004) 4659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Z.Y. Jin et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 3111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. Z.Y. Jin et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 63 (2012) 249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. C.M. Sellars et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280 (2000) 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  88. H. Hållberg et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 49 (2010) 25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. C.W. Zheng et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 44 (2008) 507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. F. Chen et al., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 (2009) 75015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. O.M. Ivasishin et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 433 (2006) 216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  92. R.A. Petkovic et al., Can. Met. Quart. 14 (1975) 137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  93. F. Chen et al., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20 (2012) 045008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  94. R.L. Goetz et al., Scripta Mate. 38 (1998) 405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  95. N. Yazdipour et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 44 (2008) 566. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  96. H.L. Ding et al., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 (2009) 025009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  97. F. Chen, PhD thesis, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  98. F. Chen et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 83 (2014) 331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  99. Z. Liu et al., J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 5 (1996) 521. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  100. C.W. Zheng et al., Scripta Mater. 58 (2008) 838. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  101. C.W. Zheng et al., Acta Mater. 57 (2009) 2956. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  102. C.W. Zheng et al., Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 4768. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  103. C.W. Zheng et al., Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 5504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ø. Grong et al., Prog. Mater. Sci. 47 (2002) 163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  105. D.E. Rumelhart et al., Nature 323 (1986) 533. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  106. M.W. Craven et al., Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 13 (1997) 211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  107. Y.C. Lin et al., Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 1733. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  108. J. Kusiak et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 127 (2002) 115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  109. Y.C. Lin et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 43 (2008) 752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  110. M.Q. Li et al., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123 (2002) 377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  111. M.Q. Li et al., Mater. Charact. 49 (2003) 203. [Google Scholar]
  112. M.Q. Li et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 2265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  113. J.H. Kim et al., Met. Mater. Int. 15 (2009) 427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  114. Z.C. Sun et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 50 (2010) 308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.